Headlines
Vitter Tells USF Interview Committee Reasons Why He Resigned as Chancellor
By Anna Grace Usery
Editor-in-Chief
anna.grace.usery@hottytoddy.com
Former Ole Miss Chancellor and current distinguished professor Jeffrey Vitter said in a panel interview yesterday to vie for the next president of the University of South Florida that he left the Ole Miss because of tension regarding the campus’ longstanding racial issues and now-concluded NCAA investigation.
Former Ole Miss Chancellor Jeff Vitter. File photo.
The Tampa Bay Times reports Vitter was the second of four finalists to interview on Wednesday, March 20. He began the interview with reasons why he left Ole Miss, Times reporter Megan Reeves confirmed.
According to the Times, Vitter said in front of a USF search committee that he was brought in (to Ole Miss) to be an agent of change.
“But I made the mistake of underestimating, really, the level of entrenchment and lack of common agreement at Ole Miss,” he said.
He attributed that lack of common agreement to racial issues related to Mississippi’s Civil War History and an ongoing NCAA investigation.
He went on to say much of the “human capital” he had went to dealing with tensions related to those issues.
“That attention really drew away … from academic issues,” Vitter said.
In his resignation letter to students, faculty and staff on Nov. 13, 2018, Vitter gave no clear indication why he was leaving the university aside from his conclusion “that the time is right for someone new to take the helm.”
“Serving as your chancellor has been the greatest professional privilege of my life. We have dealt with taxing challenges and big opportunities, and we have built a solid foundation and momentum for the future,” he stated in his letter.
Jim Zook, vice chancellor for strategic communications and marketing, said he could not comment on Vitter’s USF interview calling them “his pursuits.”
He also declined to comment whether Vitter resigned from the chancellor position in hopes of being named USF’s newest president.
Reeves said post-interview the committee held a roundtable discussion about the positives of each candidate. When it came to Vitter, she said, several committee members commented.
According to the reporter, one committee member said Vitter dealt with hard issues right out front and thought that was “an indication of some trait of leadership.”
One university trustee said “he did it unemotionally and very clearly” and that he “didn’t dig deep enough before starting at Ole Miss.”
Vitter served as chancellor until Jan. 3, 2019 and has continued employment at the university as a tenured Distinguished Professor in the School of Engineering’s Department of Computer and Information Science.
USF is scheduled to select its seventh president Friday, March 22.
| Sat, Aug 31 |  | vs Furman | W, 76-0 |
| Sat, Sep 7 |  | vs Middle Tennessee | W, 52-3 |
| Sat, Sep 14 |  | @ Wake Forest | W, 40-6 |
| Sat, Sep 21 |  | vs Georgia Southern | W, 52-13 |
| Sat, Sep 28 |  | vs Kentucky | L, 20-17 |
| Sat, Oct 5 |  | @ South Carolina | W, 27-3 |
| Sat, Oct 12 |  | vs LSU | L, 29-26 (2 OT) |
| Sat, Oct 26 |  | vs Oklahoma | W, 26-14 |
| Sat, Nov 2 |  | @ Arkansas | W, 63-35 |
| Sat, Nov 16 |  | vs Georgia | W, 28-10 |
| Sat, Nov 23 |  | @ Florida | 11:00 AM ABC or ESPN |
| Sat, Nov 30 |  | vs Mississippi State | 2:30 PM ESPN or ABC |
Piggy Howell
March 22, 2019 at 9:47 pm
Dr. Vitter, if Ole Miss is so out of touch and behind the”politically Correct” times,
THEN why is the minority enrollment close to 20%???? I think only MSU has a higher number in the SEC!
Just another reason that the big Universities in MS. need to out from under the IHL.
Elle Muses
March 23, 2019 at 12:00 am
Last I read, nearly 40% of Mississippi’s population is African-American. Chancellor Vitter was not out of touch. He overestimated the prospect of being able to change antiquated beliefs of some firmly-entrenched Ole Miss constituents.
Brad Smart
March 28, 2019 at 11:47 am
It sounds like Mr. Vitter accepted the job at Ole Miss while failing to understand that the “change” that he was hoping to be an “agent of”, would entail completely stripping the university of its identity. When you ram change down the throat of the majority of stake-holders, the results are even deeper division.