45.6 F
Oxford

Commissioner J.R. Rigby: What You Should Know About Oxford Commons


*Editor’s Note: To see previously written news articles of the Planning Commission’s Jan. 8 and Feb. 12 meetings regarding Case 2267, read Planning Staff Withdraws Request to Change Zoning in Oxford Commons District and Angry Oxford Commons Residents Packed the Room in Planning Commission Meeting.

Monday night’s Planning Commission agenda included three cases concerning the Oxford Commons Planned Unit Development (PUD) on Sisk Ave. east of Highway 7. These cases raised concerns from residents expressed through numerous emails, phone calls and letters to the Planning Commission. Recurrent themes in these contacts suggested that circulation of some fundamental information in the cases might be warranted. The following Q&A is an attempt to address this need. I will begin with the big picture of what happened on Monday night regarding Case 2267 and what happens now. I will then address some more detailed questions relating to the development before closing with a short discussion of the vision for Oxford Commons, past and present.

What happened Monday night?
Case 2267 on the Planning Commission agenda for Monday night’s meeting was intended to be a public hearing for the details of a Planning Department staff recommendation to repair the errors and dysfunctional elements of the governing documents for the Oxford Commons PUD. The recommendation proposed to increase the development potential on the tracts where property owners had been left with zero potential due to mistakes and missing administrative details in the governing documents. In response to overwhelmingly negative feedback from Oxford Commons residents, the Planning Department staff withdrew their recommendation from the Planning Commission agenda at the hearing on Monday evening. With the withdrawal of the agenda item and the denial of requests to rezone constituent properties out of the PUD, no change to the zoning of Oxford Commons PUD that would keep the PUD intact and fix its governing documents was heard by the commission. This inaction is not a solution, however, and it leaves the problematic future of Oxford Commons in the hands of the developers.
What now?
Because no corrections were made to the governing documents of the Oxford Commons PUD Monday night, six commercial properties (totaling seven acres) will be forced to remain vacant. The governing documents do not specify how goals such as the 100 plus acres of land area devoted to recreational space will be created or preserved among the many properties making up the PUD. There is also still no mechanism to distribute the square footage assigned to undeveloped tracts of the PUD comprising multiple property owners where development potential is still available. Thus, development proposals will be received and approved on a first-come, first-serve basis by the Planning Department until all of the allotted square footage for each tract has been obligated.
Additionally, the current allocation mechanism does not effectively manage density for individual commercial lots within the larger tracts. With a five-story height limit by right in the affected areas, in effect the remaining square footage for an entire tract could be used by a single property owner building to the maximum height allowance on a single, relatively small lot. Thus, the current zoning in the PUD is also the scenario most likely to result in a high-rise at Oxford Commons, one that could further result in a tall building surrounded by undevelopable lots. This is one potential outcome of the current zoning that the city sought to fix.
What is the height limit for development in Oxford Commons?
For lots within 3,000 feet of Highway 7 and zoned Suburban Center (SCN) or Suburban Corridor (SCO), the existing allowance is five stories (max 65 feet) by right. These conditions apply to most of the commercial property in Oxford Commons. “By right” means that developers need no special permission from Planning Department staff, Planning Commission or the Board of Aldermen to build to this height. This height allowance was granted in the original PUD ordinance.
Are multi-family residential units allowed in Oxford Commons?
Currently, up to 414 multi-family units are allowed on tracts A and B1 with another 464 attached units (townhomes, condominiums) allowed on tract E. The original PUD documents (2005) included some residential potential on tract A1 as a mixed-use tract, but this potential was removed in a complicated set of revisions leading to the 2015 PUD documents. The staff recommendation for Case 2267 included restoring this potential to A1. The Oxford Commons PUD also includes a restriction that no multi-family unit may have more than three bedrooms.
Is rental housing allowed in Oxford Commons?
The only restriction on rentals in the Oxford Commons PUD is a requirement on tract A that units be marketed for individual ownership. This does not prevent individuals from renting out units subsequently, nor does it limit the number of units an individual may buy and subsequently offer for rent. No other tracts within the PUD have such a restriction.
Are the residential units intended for student housing?
Based on the Vision 2037 Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Department does not see a need for increasing student housing in the city, and policies to increase multi-family housing should not be interpreted as such. The housing analysis in the Comprehensive Plan demonstrates that Oxford needs an increased diversity of housing options to meet demand. The plan also recognizes, for example, that one of the groups contributing most to housing demand, and also most in need of diverse housing options, is the 25-44 age group, which includes young families. This demographic accounts for over half of the forecasted demand for new housing units. In the Vision 2037 housing analysis, this demographic also occupied over a third of the city’s rental units. Providing diverse housing options within walking distance of two city schools would be a significant benefit to the Oxford Commons PUD as well as the broader community.
What is FAR?
FAR is a piece of technical jargon that has come up in the discussion of development density in Oxford Commons. FAR, or floor-area-ratio, is the ratio of developed floor area to the land area of a parcel. If you own a one-acre lot and you have a one-story home that covers half the lot, your FAR is 0.5. If you instead have a two-story home with the same total floor area, your FAR would still be 0.5, though the building would take up less space on the lot.
Would an increase in commercial density result in development similar to West Jackson Avenue?
All of the commercial tracts in the PUD between Highway 7 and the high school will have FARs between 0.1 and 0.35 if developed to their current full potential. I asked Planning Department staff what other parts of the city have a similar FAR. The Galleria II shopping center on West Jackson Ave. has an average FAR close to 0.25. The Courthouse Square, for comparison, has a FAR of 2, or nearly 10 times that of the Galleria II.
The Oxford Commons PUD was once marketed as Oxford’s “second Square” for its focus on walkability and dense central development. While a FAR of 2 is unrealistic in Oxford Commons, limiting density to that comparable with the Galleria II should raise concern that the result of the current zoning in the PUD will be more sprawling development like that of West Jackson Ave.
Would increasing commercial square footage result in high-rises?
The Planning Department staff recommendation included an increase in the development potential up to a FAR of 0.75 on currently vacant properties in tract A1. Would this result in a high-rise? Since for a FAR of 0.75 the potential floor area of a one-story building would only take up 75 percent of the lot area, the most likely configuration would be a two-story building. If, for example, a three-story building were built, this would result in a building covering only a quarter of the lot. This might be done perhaps in order to allot the other 75 percent of the lot to green space and parking, but would certainly not in any way be a necessary result of allowing a FAR of 0.75.
Why increase density with the current traffic situation?
Development in the Oxford Commons PUD is currently limited by inadequate transportation connectivity. The city is addressing this problem with the Sisk Ave. extension and by seeking means of improving the exit from Highway 7 onto Sisk Ave. At issue in the zoning discussion is the future development potential of the PUD. If present transportation infrastructure were the determining factor, we should stop all development in the PUD at its current level. Clearly that is both unreasonable and undesirable. The question is, rather, what the development potential should be, given adequate transportation connectivity in the future. With Oxford Commons situated in proximity to three state highways, none of the zoning proposals under consideration should be rejected based on what is currently considered reasonable expectations of future transportation connectivity.
Why was the alternative proposal not supported by staff?
An alternative proposal to apportion the remaining square footage in the PUD was submitted for staff consideration which would keep the total square footage for the PUD unchanged and simply move some commercial potential among the tracts. The reallocation of remaining square footage would result in slightly reduced density on tract A to shift development potential to affected properties in A1. Property owners who would be affected by this plan objected to the limited square footage allotted to them through this proposal. Since affected property owners did not support the plan and there were already concerns about the character of development such low densities would attract, the Planning Department found little merit in this proposal for rezoning the PUD.
What is the vision for the Oxford Commons PUD?
Interestingly, to describe the aims of the development, the 2005 original documents for the Oxford Commons PUD reference the work of Andres Duany and the principles of New Urbanism – an approach to urban development stressing mixed-use, walkability, shared parking and higher density alongside open public space. These are the same principles behind the Vision 2037 Comprehensive Plan and the recently adopted Land Development Code. In essence, Oxford Commons was ahead of its time. In 2005, Planned Unit Developments were a relatively new concept and served as a mechanism for creating mixed-used developments in otherwise single-use areas.
In the dozen years since Oxford Commons was conceived, the rest of the city has caught up with these principles, at least where zoning is concerned, and in some ways, has surpassed it in terms of understanding the planning tools necessary to achieve those goals. We now have a Land Development Code and Zoning Map emphasizing mixed-use, walkability and higher density throughout the city to promote pockets of dense, mixed-use development with access to many neighborhoods. This is, in no small part, to avoid the mistakes of Jackson Ave.
The “second Square” of the original Oxford Commons never materialized nor did shared parking. We now know that in terms of FAR, the original development potential allotted to the tracts in the PUD made a “second Square” all but impossible – there simply wasn’t enough square footage to realize the densities pictured in the visioning documents.
The City of Oxford, its staff and officials have a clear interest in the success of something like the original concept for Oxford Commons. In the current situation, however, the Planning Department is concerned that Oxford Commons is on a development trajectory much closer to Jackson Ave. than the Courthouse Square. Extensive efforts to sort through the history of the PUD and find a reasonable solution led to the rezoning proposals on Monday’s agenda. The irony, of course, is that a once forward-looking development is now in danger of repeating mistakes of the past unless the developers, residents and the city can come to a consensus on how to amend the PUD zoning.

***

I have presented here answers to a few questions that I thought were pertinent to the concerns expressed to the Commission leading up to Monday’s meeting. This is by no means all of the information in the case, nor does it represent any position of the City of Oxford, but I hope it is of use to those residents who have shown interest and engagement in the issues surrounding the development of Oxford Commons. I encourage those interested in this matter to use all the information available in weighing the options for the best long-term solution as it impacts both the PUD and the wider Oxford community.
Having studied over 100 pages of documents myself in preparation for Monday night’s meeting, I sympathize with any resident of Oxford trying to understand the issues in this very complex case. Please ask questions — especially if you have specific questions or concerns. Ask a commissioner or a staff member. We have a tremendously competent and hard-working staff. Oxford only benefits if we take advantage of their expertise.


By J.R. Rigby, Planning Commissioner. Rigby is a research hydrologist with the National Sedimentation Laboratory. He was appointed as a Planning Commissioner with the City of Oxford by the Board of Aldermen in August 2017. To contact Rigby directly, click here
For other questions or comments, email us at hottytoddynews@gmail.com

Most Popular

Recent Comments

scamasdscamith on News Watch Ole Miss
Frances Phillips on A Bigger, Better Student Union
Grace Hudditon on A Bigger, Better Student Union
Millie Johnston on A Bigger, Better Student Union
Binary options + Bitcoin = $ 1643 per week: https://8000-usd-per-day.blogspot.com.tr?b=46 on Beta Upsilon Chi: A Christian Brotherhood
Jay Mitchell on Reflections: The Square
Terry Wilcox SFCV USA RET on Oxford's Five Guys Announces Opening Date
Stephanie on Throwback Summer
organized religion is mans downfall on VP of Palmer Home Devotes Life to Finding Homes for Children
Paige Williams on Boyer: Best 10 Books of 2018
Keith mansel on Cleveland On Medgar Evans
Debbie Nader McManus on Cofield on Oxford — Lest We Forget
Bettye H. Galloway on Galloway: The Last of His Kind
Richard Burns on A William Faulkner Sighting
Bettye H. Galloway on Galloway: Faulkner's Small World
Bettye H Galloway on Galloway: Faulkner's Small World
Bettye H Galloway on Galloway: Faulkner's Small World
Bettye H. Galloway on Galloway: Faulkner's Small World
Ruby Begonia on Family Catching Rebel Fever
Greg Millar on The Hoka
Greg Millar on The Hoka
Greg Millar on The Hoka
Greg Millar on The Hoka
jeff the busy eater on Cooking With Kimme: Baked Brie
Travis Yarborough on Reflections: The Square
BAD TASTE IN MY MOUTH on Oxford is About to Receive a Sweet Treat
baby travel systems australia on Heaton: 8 Southern Ways to Heckle in SEC Baseball
Rajka Radenkovich on Eating Oxford: Restaurant Watch
Richard Burns on Reflections: The Square
Guillermo Perez Arguello on Mississippi Quote Of The Day
A Friend with a Heavy Heart on Remembering Dr. Stacy Davidson
Harold M. "Hal" Frost, Ph.D. on UM Physical Acoustics Research Center Turns 30
Educated Citizen on Buzzed Driving is Drunk Driving
Debbie Crenshaw on Trump’s Tough Road Ahead
Treadway Strickland on Wicker Looks Ahead to New Congress
Tony Ryals on parking
Heather Lee Hitchcock on ‘Pray for Oxford’ by Shane Brown
Heather Lee Hitchcock on ‘Pray for Oxford’ by Shane Brown
Dr Donald and Priscilla Powell on Deadly Plane Crash Leaves Eleven Children Behind
Dr Donald and Priscilla Powell on Deadly Plane Crash Leaves Eleven Children Behind
C. Scott Fischer on I Stand With Coach Hugh Freeze
Sylvia Williams on I Stand With Coach Hugh Freeze
Will Patterson on I Stand With Coach Hugh Freeze
Rick Henderson on I Stand With Coach Hugh Freeze
George L Price on I Stand With Coach Hugh Freeze
on
Morgan Shands on Cleveland: On Ed Reed
Richard McGraw on Cleveland: On Cissye Gallagher
Branan Southerland on Gameday RV Parking at HottyToddy.com
Tom and Randa Baddley on Vassallo: Ole Miss Alum Finds His Niche
26 years and continuously learning on Ole Miss Puts History In Context With Plaque
a Paterson on Beyond Barton v. Barnett
Phil Higginbotham on ‘Unpublished’ by Shane Brown
Bettina Willie@www.yahoo.com.102Martinez St.Batesville,Ms.38606 on Bomb Threat: South Panola High School Evacuated This Morning
Anita M Fellenz, (Emilly Hoffman's CA grandmother on Ole Miss Spirit Groups Rank High in National Finals
Marilyn Moore Hughes on Vassallo: Ole Miss Alum Finds His Niche
Jaqundacotten@gmail williams on HottyToddy Hometown: Hollandale, Mississippi
Finney moore on Can Ole Miss Grow Too Big?
diane faulkner cawlley on Oxford’s Olden Days: Miss Annie’s Yard
Phil Higginbotham on ‘November 24’ by Shane Brown
Maralyn Bullion on Neely-Dorsey: Hog Killing Time
Beth Carr on A Letter To Mom
Becky on A Letter To Mom
Marilyn Tinnnin on A Letter To Mom
Roger ulmer on UM Takes Down State Flag
Chris Pool on UM Takes Down State Flag
TampaRebel on UM Takes Down State Flag
david smith on UM Takes Down State Flag
Boyd Harris on UM Takes Down State Flag
Jim (Herc @ UM) on Cleveland: Fall Vacations
Robert Hollingsworth on Rebels on the Road: Memphis Eateries
David McCullough on Shepard Leaves Ole Miss Football
Gayle G. Henry on Meet Your 2015 Miss Ole Miss
Guillermo F. Perez-Argüello on Neely-Dorsey: Elvis Presley’s Big Homecoming
Jennifer Mooneyham on ESPN: Ole Miss No. 1 in Nation
Wes McIngvale on Ole Miss Defeats Alabama
BARRY MCCAMMON on Ole Miss Defeats Alabama
Laughing out Loud on ESPN: Ole Miss No. 1 in Nation
Dr.Bill Priester on Cleveland: On Bob Priester
A woman who has no WHITE PRIVILEGE on Oxford Removes Mississippi Flag from City Property
A woman who has no WHITE PRIVILEGE on Oxford Removes Mississippi Flag from City Property
paulette holmes langbecker on Cofield on Oxford – Rising Ole Miss Rookie
Ruth Shipp Yarbrough on Cofield on Oxford — Lest We Forget
Karllen Smith on ‘Rilee’ by Shane Brown
Jean Baker Pinion on ‘The Cool Pad’ by Shane Brown
Janet Hollingsworth (Cavanaugh) on John Cofield on Oxford: A Beacon
Proud Mississippi Voter on Gunn Calls for Change in Mississippi Flag
Deloris Brown-Thompson on Bebe’s Letters: A WWII Love Story
Sue Ellen Parker Stubbs on Bebe’s Letters: A WWII Love Story
Tim Heaton on Heaton: Who is Southern?
Tim Heaton on Heaton: Who is Southern?
Karen fowler on Heaton: Who is Southern?
Don't Go to Law School on Four Legal Rebels Rising in the Real World
bernadette on Feeding the Blues
bernadette on Feeding the Blues
Joanne and Mark Wilkinson on Ron Vernon: a Fellowship of Music
Mary Ellen (Dring) Gamble on Ron Vernon: a Fellowship of Music
Cyndy Carroll on Filming it Up in Mississippi
Dottie Dewberry on Top 10 Secret Southern Sayings
Brother Everett Childers on ‘The Shack’ by Shane Brown
Mark McElreath on ‘The Shack’ by Shane Brown
Bill Wilkes, UM '57, '58, '63 on A Letter from Chancellor Dan Jones
Sandra Caffey Neal on Mississippi Has Proud Irish Heritage
Teresa Enyeart, and Terry Enyeat on Death of Ole Miss Grad, U.S. Vet Stuns Rebel Nation
P. D. Fyke on Wells: Steelhead Run
Johnny Neumann on Freeze Staying with Rebels
Maralyn Bullion on On Cooking Southern: Chess Pie
Kaye Bryant on Henry: E. for Congress
charles Eichorn on Hotty Tamales, Gosh Almighty
Jack of All Trades on Roll Over Bear Bryant
w nadler on Roll Over Bear Bryant
Stacey Berryhill on Oxford Man Dies in Crash
John Appleton on Grovin' Gameday Memories
Charlotte Lamb on Grovin' Gameday Memories
Guillermo F. Perez-Argüello on Two True Mississippi Icons
Morgan Williamson on A College Education is a MUST
Morgan Williamson on A College Education is a MUST
Jeanette Berryhill Wells on HottyToddy Hometown: Senatobia, Mississippi
Tire of the same ole news on 3 "Must Eat" Breakfast Spots in Oxford
gonna be a rebelution on Walking Rebel Fans Back Off the Ledge
Nora Jaccaud on Rickshaws in Oxford
Martha Marshall on Educating the Delta — Or Not
Nita McVeigh on 'I'm So Oxford' Goes Viral
Guillermo F. Perez-Argüello on How a Visit to the Magnolia State Can Inspire You
Charlie Fowler Jr. on Prawns? In the Mississippi Delta?
Martha Marshall on A Salute to 37 Years of Sparky
Sylvia Hartness Williams on Oxford Approves Diversity Resolution
Jerry Greenfield on Wine Tip: Problem Corks
Cheryl Obrentz on I Won the Lottery! Now What?
Bnogas on Food for the Soul
Barbeque Memphis on History of Tennessee Barbecue
Josephine Bass on The Delta and the Civil War
Nicolas Morrison on The Walking Man
Pete Williams on Blog: MPACT’s Future
Laurie Triplette on On Cooking Southern: Fall Veggies
Harvey Faust on The Kream Kup of the Krop
StarReb on The Hoka
Scott Whodatty Keetereaux Keet on Hip Hop — Yo or No, What’s Your Call
Johnathan Doeman on Oxford Man Dies in Crash
Andy McWilliams on The Warden & The Chief
Kathryn McElroy on Think Like A Writer
Claire Duff Sullivan on Alert Dogs Give Diabetics Peace of Mind
Jesse Yancy on The Hoka
Jennifer Thompson Walker on Ole Miss, Gameday From The Eyes of a Freshman
HottyToddy.com